We Don’t Learn From Experience …

Cross posted at Education is My Life …

Race to the Top and related state legislation has brought a klieg light focus to the issue of teacher evaluation … and along with the spotlight has come the expected frenzy as schools and districts comply with yet another partially funded mandate. As with many such initiatives, educational leaders are faced with an important choice: get it done (compliance) OR seize the opportunity to consider the potential of developing an evaluation system that positively impacts student learning. The beauty of choice #2 is that it does not preclude complying with the legislation.

Why Do We Evaluate Teachers

There are essentially two important reasons to evaluate teachers. The first is quality assurance … no one would argue that families have a right to expect that a school system provide quality teachers for their children. The second, however, is to support and encourage professional growth. The key is in finding the balance between these two goals.

As schools and districts embark on rethinking their evaluation systems, the most urgent demand is to attend to the WHAT and HOW of the initiative: what model will we use for our performance criteria? How many observations a year for each teacher? What forms will we use? How will we train the observers to collect objective data? The list of WHAT and HOW is lengthy, complicated, and important. More relevant to professional growth, however, is to address the question of WHY. Why are we using this model? Why are we choosing to observe teachers x numbers of visits a year? Why will this form enhance the process? Why are we training observers to collect objective data?

It’s More Than A Process

Wrestling with the WHY leads to the most critical aspect of the process: providing teachers the support and encouragement to become reflective about their own practice. It is far too easy to get caught up in the processes of teacher evaluation and lose sight of the rationale for doing it in the first place: to positively impact learning experiences for students. To do that, teachers need the time, resources, and supportive culture to become increasingly reflective about the complex work that they do.

In the traditional evaluation process—one that so many teachers in the US have experienced—a teacher might be observed once a year and the observer (typically the principal) would write up their impressions of the observation for the teacher to read and sign. In this model, the teacher has very little opportunity to become participatory in the process.

As we attempt to reform evaluation processes in our schools, the most important shift is not about the model, the forms, the processes, or any of the WHAT and HOW pieces—it is to create reflection opportunities for teachers. No matter what process a school or district adopts, there are multiple opportunities for reflection.

Steps to Reflection

Pre-Observation … Teacher lesson plans come in all shapes and sizes, from 1-inch sticky notes slapped in a spiral notebook, to lengthy narratives complete with research and blow-by-blow descriptions of activities. The planning process is a prime opportunity for teachers to think critically about an all-important question: what do I want my students to learn? Most teachers will be able to describe what the students will do, but it sometimes takes some reflective digging to get at the true learning objectives of a lesson.

Post-Observation … I look forward to the day when a post-observation meeting is no longer simply about filling out and signing a form for the HR department. The post-observation meeting is a golden opportunity to review the data collected during a lesson and have a meaningful professional dialogue about what worked and what might be improved. The observer’s most important job is to provide an environment and structure for the teacher to engage in cognitive analysis about his or her own practice. This requires a shift from the traditional conference in which the principal does little more than inform teachers of their “rating” on a lesson, to one in which the post-observation meeting is a conversation between two professional educators who share the same goal: how to positively impact instruction.

On-going … Yes, time is tight and demands on teachers and school leaders are pressing. But if we really embrace that the prime directive of schools is to create excellent learning environments for students, then our focus needs to move away from management to instruction. This notion suggests that we should continually be seeking ongoing opportunities to do this—not reserve it for a district-mandated beginning and end-of-year meetings. Simply marching through the steps of a process will not result in any meaningful change. That will only happen through deep reflection and a desire to learn and grow.

In reality, this notion is independent of any particular initiative, or system, or legislation … it’s a simple idea based on an ages-old principle of practice. To paraphrase John Dewey: We do not learn from experiences, we learn from reflecting on those experiences.*

*Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan

Recently found … 05/24/2013

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Games for Change Festival – NYC June 17-19!

Games for Change catalyzes social impact through digital games.

Founded in 2004, Games for Change facilitates the creation and distribution of social impact games that serve as critical tools in humanitarian and educational efforts.

We aim to leverage entertainment and engagement for social good. To further grow the field, Games for Change convenes multiple stakeholders, highlights best practices, incubates games, and helps create and direct investment into new projects.

The Games for Change Festival is the largest gaming event in New York City and the leading international event uniting “games for change” creators with those interested in accessing the positive social impact of games.

Click to learn more!

Ken Robinson on the Culture of Education in America

TED talks hosted a special show (broadcasted on PBS) around US education, specifically focusing on reducing the high school drop out rate. Ken Robinson’s discussion of alternative education and the role of standardized testing was particularly noteworthy. Excerpt here:

Robinson-Culture of US Education

Watch the entire program here.

Recently found … 05/04/2013

  • Interesting data …

    tags: assessment educational reform

    • once you compare students from similar income and class backgrounds, our relative performance improves dramatically, suggesting that our educational problems may be as much about our sheer number of poor families as our supposedly poor schools.
    • When it comes to raw numbers, it turns out we generally have far more top performers than any other developed nation.
    • If we have so many of the best minds, why are our average scores so disappointingly average? As Rutgers’s Hal Salzman and Georgetown’s B. Lindsay Lowell, who co-authored the EPI report, noted in a 2008 Nature article, our high scorers are balanced out by an very large number of low scorers. Our education system, just like our economy, is polarized. 

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Recently found … 05/03/2013

    • I call it the McDonald’s Theory: people are inspired to come up with good ideas to ward off bad ones.
    • There’s no defined process for all creative work, but I’ve come to believe that all creative endeavors share one thing: the second step is easier than the first. Always
    • “Go!” Exactly. Dive in. Do. Stop over-thinking it.
    • It takes a crazy kind of courage, of focus, of foolhardy perseverance to quiet all those doubts long enough to move forward. But it’s possible, you just have to start

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.